Over   240 age ago , renowned mathematician Leonhard Euler came up with a doubtfulness : if six US Army regiment each have six policeman of six different rank , can they be arranged in a hearty formation such that no run-in or column repeats either a rank or regiment ?

After search in vain for a root , Euler declared the problem unacceptable – and over a century later on , the French mathematician Gaston Tarry demonstrate him right . Then , 60 year afterthat , when the Second Coming ofcomputersremoved the want for laboriously testing every potential combination by hired man , the mathematiciansParker , Bose , and Shrikhandeproved an even stronger result : not only is the six - by - six square unsufferable , but it ’s theonlysize of square other than two - by - two that does n’t have a solution at all .

Now , in math , once a theorem is examine , it ’s proven forever . So it may be surprising to learn that a 2022 newspaper publisher , published in the journal Physical Review Letters , has apparently come up a resolution . There ’s just one catch : the officer have to exist in a state of quantum web .

![Four-by-four orthogonal Latin square](https://assets.iflscience.com/assets/articleNo/72170/iImg/72997/36 officers.jpg)

No color repeats in any direction; no number repeats in any direction; all numbers in all colors are represented.Image credit: IFLScience

“ I think their paper is very beautiful , ” quantum physicist Gemma De las Cuevas , who was not involved with the workplace , toldQuanta Magazineat the time . “ There ’s a quite a little of quantum magic in there . And not only that , but you could find throughout the paper [ the authors ’ ] roll in the hay for the problem . ”

To excuse what ’s going on , let ’s set out with a classical example . Euler ’s “ 36 Officers ” job , as it is known , is a limited type of sorcerous square called an “ rectangular Latin square ” – cogitate of it like two sudokus that you have to solve at the same fourth dimension in the same grid . For example , a four - by - four orthogonal Latin square toes might look like this :

With each square in the grid specify like this – with a fix number and a cook color – Euler ’s original six - by - six trouble is impossible . However , in the quantum world , thing are more flexible : thing exist insuperpositionsof states .

![Superposition of a green two and a red one](https://assets.iflscience.com/assets/articleNo/72170/iImg/72998/euler's puzzle.jpg)

Reen owo? Gred Tone?Image credit: IFLScience

In basic terms – or at least , as basic as it can get when we ’re sing about quantum physics – this mean that any given general can be multiple rank of multiple regiments at the same time . Using our colourful duple - sudoku case , we could reckon a square toes in the grid being filled with , say , a principle of superposition of a green two and a red one .

Now , the investigator thought , Euler ’s problem would have a solution . But what was it ?

At first glance , it might seem that the team had made their job a lot harder . Not only did they have to resolve a six - by - six double sudoku that was get it on to be impossible in the classical setting , but now they had to do it in multiple dimensions at once .

Luckily , though , they had a twosome of things on their side : first , a classical near - solvent that they could apply as a jump - off breaker point , and second , theseemingly mysteriousproperty of quantum entanglement .

Put merely , two states are said to be entangled when one state say you something about the other . As a classic doctrine of analogy , imagine you experience your friend has two tiddler , A and B ( your friend is n’t good at names ) of the same gender . That means that know that nipper A is a miss tells you with certainty that child B is also a girl – the two kid ’s genders are entangled .

Entanglement does n’t always work out this nicely , where one state tells you perfectly everything about the other – but when it does , it ’s called an utterly maximally entangled ( AME ) Department of State . Another lesson might be interchange coins : if Alice and Bob each flip a coin and Alice gets heads , then if the coins are entangled , Bob acknowledge without look that he got tails , and frailty versa .

Remarkably , the solution to this quantum officer problem turn out to have this property – and this is where it gets really interesting . See , the example above works for two coins , and for three , but for four , it ’s impossible . But the 36 Officers problem is n’t like flipping die , the source realize – it ’s more like roll embroiled dice .

“ [ ideate that ] Alice choose any two dice and rolls them , obtaining one of 36 evenly likely outcomes , as Bob rolls the remaining ones . If the entire state is AME , Alice can always deduce the consequence obtained in Bob ’s part of the four - company system , ” the paper explains .

“ Furthermore , such a DoS allows one to teleport any unknown , two - dice quantum state , from any two owners of two subsystems to the lab possess the two other die of the entangled state of the four - party system of rules , ” the authors stay . “ This is not possible if the dice are interchange by two - sided coin . ”

Because these AME system can often be excuse using impertinent Latin squares , researcher already knew that they exist for four people throw away die with any number of sides at all – any , that is , other than two or six . recall : those orthogonal Romance squares do n’t exist , so they ca n’t be used to show the existence of an AME state in that attribute .

However ,   by find a answer to Euler ’s 243 - year - old problem , the investigator had done something amazing : they had constitute an AME system of four parties of proportion six . In doing so , they may even have discovered a whole new kind of AME – one with no parallel in a classical organisation .

“ Euler … take in 1779 that no solution live . The substantiation , by Tarry , arrive only 121 years later in 1900 , ” the authors write . “ After another 121 years , we have presented a root to the quantum version wherein the officers can be snarl . ”

“ The quantum design presented here will probably trigger further research in the nascent field of quantum combinatorics , ” they conclude .

The cogitation is published inPhysical Review Letters .

An earlier interlingual rendition of this clause was release inJanuary 2022 .