NASA has been accuse of dismissing fear raised by the astronomy residential area over the controversial   naming of the James Webb Space Telescope ( JWST ) as evidence of its internal investigation and the conclusion process to not rename it have been brought to light thanks to a Freedom of Information ( FOI ) request from the journalNature by journalist Alexandra Witze .

A petition was started by stargazer to rename the scope in early 2021 , alleging Webb had been complicit in the ignition of LGBT federal employees in his part as Under Secretary of State during the 1950s and ' 60s prior to his clip at NASA . NASA found an probe but ultimately announced it would not be changing the name because it had find no evidence to corroborate the accusations .

The FOI request discover a series ofinternal NASA documentsfrom between January 1 and October 13 , 2021 , that prove the current NASA government was aware of the liberation of at least one gay employee while Webb was NASA top dog .

Thousands of astronomerssigned the petition require for a reassessment of the naming of the telescope to separate the next - multiplication instrument from someone link to a glowering chapter in American history . The petition was lead by Dr Chanda Prescod - Weinstein , astrophysicist   Dr Sarah Tuttle , astronomer Dr Lucianne Walkowicz , and astrophysicist Dr Brian Nord .

NASA harmonize to conduct a limited review and publish its determination . In September 2021 , NASA announced that the young flagship space telescopewould keep its controversial namewhile not releasing its report or any data about its investigation .

“ We have found no grounds at this time that stock-purchase warrant exchange the name of the James Webb Space Telescope , ” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson enunciate in astatement sent to IFLScienceand shared with just a few other news electrical outlet but not with the public .

IFLScience followed this statement up by ask to see the findings of the review andreceived this reply :   “ We truly do n’t have anything to cover because our investigation has n’t found anything , ” from Karen Fox , Senior Science Communications Officer for NASA .

In an electronic mail   see April 11 , 2021 , Dr Eric Smith , the JWST Deputy Program Director , was made aware that a NASA employee , Clifford Norton , was fired in 1963 because his supervisor suspected him of being cheery . Incourt legal proceeding , the NASA Official who fired him , a Mr Garbarini , describe him as a “ competent employee ” doing “ very good ” work and inquire if there was any direction of keeping him on . It was Garbarini ’s consultant who recount him that fire suspect homosexual employees was “ a custom within the agency ” . The e-mail to Smith stresses that this paragraph “ sounds reasonably spoiled . ”

In response to the FOI revelations , Walkowicz , Prescod - Weinstein , Tuttle , and Nord released astatementaccusing NASA of hiding finding that affirmed Webb ’s homophobia and that the quad agency " gaslit " multitude in September with what it chose to — and not to — announce . They also state that the firing of Norton was either a conclusion take by Webb himself or with his full knowledge as Administrator .

Furthermore , they argue that the internal document show that NASA had received several strong recommendations free-base on Webb ’s history to deepen the scope ’s name , and that the agency herald in September there was no grounds found while evidence had both been put forward and NASA historians were still looking into it .

“ As a mathematical group of scientists , we see this dodging of actual evidence at one of the world ’s lead scientific organization to be deeply disconcerting , " they   say in thestatement . " Between the four of us , we have hold internships , fellowship , grants , and advisory and leadership purpose on NASA projects . We are not detached observers . This is injury from a community we have committed essential time to and which we are passionate about . "

Online , citizenry are again raising the question of what kind of deterrent example the bureau is set for member of the LGBTQ+ community in STEM . Only a few weeks ago , NASA came under criticism forremoving the abilityto admit pronoun in employees ' IDs at the NASA Goddard Institute , which some depict as an plan of attack on the LGBTQ+ community .

Research shows that   LGBTQ+ people in STEM are stillmore likely to go through professional devaluation , censure , and harassmentthan their cisgender heterosexual colleague . The American Physics Society account in 2015 that   one - third of LGBTQ+ physicists were advised to remain in the tightlipped , and40 percent of trans workersin physics departments are misgendered in their workplace .

[ H / T : Nature ]